- The NoMoreSilence Public Tribunal is the culmination of a transparent, global moral campaign against institutionalized injustice.

 - It presents the citizens of the U.S. and the world with rigorously verified documentation — including official rulings, moral arbitration findings, institutional correspondence, public writings, and artistic interpretations — framing the case as a modern David vs. Goliath confrontation.

 - Citizens worldwide are invited to form their own judgments and optionally support the initiative through symbolic donations that reflect the value they assign to the insights gained.

 - By leveraging collective moral authority, this tribunal acts as a powerful complement—or even alternative—to standard judicial channels.

- - - - -

The Moral Culmination of a Global Campaign
The NoMoreSilence Public Tribunal represents the final chapter of our moral and intellectual battle against injustice, conducted openly and transparently before a global audience. After carefully exhausting all avenues of dialogue, documentation, and moral appeals—including the detailed Fraternal Admonition communication protocol inspired by Matthew 18:15–18—it has become evident that traditional courts often struggle to deliver justice when confronted with systemic immorality protected by a powerful state and its influential corporation.

Evidence, Art, and Judgment
In this Public Tribunal, citizens around the world will be presented with comprehensive documentation, including judicial rulings, official correspondence, results of moral arbitration, and impactful writings accompanied by powerful artistic interpretations of the modern-day David vs. Goliath struggle. These materials, gathered throughout the earlier phases of the NoMoreSilence project, will be made publicly accessible for informed and critical evaluation.

Citizens as Moral Arbiters
Each citizen is invited to form their own judgment regarding the ethical conduct of the involved large EU member state** and its associated corporation. These personal judgments collectively constitute a democratic and meaningful public verdict. Such a verdict holds significant moral authority, particularly in contexts where states and large corporations misuse their power and influence to evade justice.

Consumer Ethics and Global Responsibility
Citizens living in countries where goods and services from the large EU member state** are present may increasingly use the insights gained through this project to inform their consumer decisions. Recognizing the moral weight of supporting or distancing themselves from entities associated with injustice, these individuals can become powerful agents of accountability through everyday economic choices.
Meanwhile, citizens from other parts of the world are expected to recognize the broader ethical significance and global relevance of the NoMoreSilence project. Even if their nations are not directly affected, they may still choose to support the initiative for its potential to influence the behavior of states and corporations worldwide—by setting new expectations for transparency, justice, and public accountability.

Symbolic Donations as Ethical Support
The Public Tribunal empowers individuals worldwide by affirming their right to transparency and informed decision-making. Citizens who, after reviewing the presented evidence, find value in the project’s contribution to public morality may choose to offer symbolic donations in support of the project’s initiator. These donations act as moral endorsements or voluntary acknowledgments of the intellectual and ethical value that citizens find in the insights gained—both about the doings of the EU country** and its corporation, and about the broader influence of the NoMoreSilence initiative.

A Collective Moral Statement
Millions of potential individual judgments, paired with symbolic donations, constitute a powerful collective moral statement. Together, they represent a form of civic justice that can meaningfully supplement—or even partly replace—traditional legal action. In some cases, these donations may serve as partial compensation for the injured party, while the sheer volume of public verdicts sends a resounding ethical message. This collective moral force, rooted in global public opinion, can be more effective than isolated judicial outcomes in confronting institutionalized injustice.

Legal Preparedness and Strategic Timing
The Public Tribunal phase also serves as preparation for potential formal legal proceedings in the United States, possibly under laws such as the RICO Act, and other. This reflects confidence in the strength and fairness of the U.S. legal system. If necessary, the Public Tribunal will act as a powerful precursor—fortifying future legal actions with public legitimacy, documented evidence, and moral clarity.

A New Paradigm of Civic Power
Ultimately, this tribunal is not just an alternative to formal judicial mechanisms—it is a demonstration of the impact that collective moral judgment can have on powerful institutions. Through its Public Tribunal phase, the NoMoreSilence project introduces a compelling new paradigm in the global pursuit of justice, built on the belief that the informed voice of global citizens can prevail, even against the most entrenched adversaries.

Historical Context
The idea of public tribunals is not new. Throughout history, similar forums have emerged in various forms, responding to the social demands and institutional limitations of their time.

For further background, historical insights, and academic references, you can explore the idea of public tribunals HERE (1) and HERE (2).

The Moral Arbitration webpage will be available only after the “What Would You Do?” writing competition has been completed.